Nicholas Rescher is an American philosopher, an extremely productive one (or at least, he used to be like that). He has written a lot on epistemology. And he is also a theist, a religious believer.
Just a couple of minutes ago I received an e-mail from a German friend who pointed out to me that the German publisher Ontos Verlag will publish a new book by Rescher, titled Productive Evolution: On Reconciling Evolution with Intelligent Design. According to the description on Amazon.com the book will attempt to argue that Darwin’s evolutionary theory itself can lead to intelligent design (thus defusing the antagonism between evolutionary theory and Intelligent Design). It seems to me that Rescher wants to develop some kind of theory of “theistic evolution”, but at the same time I admit to be highly suspicious of the result. Anyway, I will postpone my judgment until I have seen the book. I just wanted to point some attention to it.
Update: I just found an interesting and quite thorough review of Rescher’s book here: http://ndpr.nd.edu/news/28786-productive-evolution-on-reconciling-evolution-with-intelligent-design/.
Have you ever looked at the website of the Richard Dawkins 
Later today I will post the second part of my evaluation of Jesse Bering’s The God / Belief Instinct. However, I recently found an interesting interview with Bering that also can function as an interesting summary of the book, here:

Recently, Richard Dawkins visited the Dutch university of Groningen for a public lecture. It was a major event, where eventually students sold (originally free) tickets for quite some money on the black market. Anyway, science journalist René Fransen, who works for the Groningen Universiteitskrant as well as for the Nederlands Dagblad did not get the chance to interview Dawkins. Instead, he asked scientists working at Groningen University what their opinion was about Richard Dawkins. I expected them to be enthusiastic about Dawkins’ qualities as a science popularizer. What I did not so much expect was the outright criticism of the scientists when it comes to Dawkins’ crusade against religion. Quite interesting.
A while ago I read Alain de Botton’s